Hobart’s Chief Magistrate has accused a high-profile Tasmanian make-up artist of repeatedly mendacity about why she stole $65,000 from her former employer, Bupa Health Insurance.Key factors:Olivia Rose Rodgers has admitted to stealing $65,000 from Bupa Health InsuranceMs Rodgers had claimed she wanted the cash, however monetary statements confirmed she was not in severe debtChief Magistrate Catherine Geason mentioned Ms Rodgers had informed completely different individuals completely different talesOlivia Rose Rodgers was set to be sentenced in Hobart Magistrates Court on Friday, after pleading responsible to 62 counts of dishonestly buying a monetary benefit in relation to two years she spent working for the insurance coverage firm.The court earlier heard the 31-year-old made multiple false insurance coverage claims on behalf of household and pals, however she was the only beneficiary of the cash.Ms Rodgers had claimed she wanted the cash as a result of Bupa had missed some funds and she was in debt.But the prosecution refuted these claims, producing financial institution statements that exposed “lavish” spending, together with an evening on the Hilton Hotel and journeys to Queensland and Bali.In court on Friday, Ms Rodgers’s lawyer Fabiano Cangelosi mentioned whereas the monetary data didn’t present Ms Rodgers was in vital debt, she perceived herself to be, partially due to her anxiousness, which is why she stole the cash.”It was a real notion. She felt that she was beneath monetary stress on the time,” he mentioned.But Chief Magistrate Catherine Geason was sceptical about that argument.”She mentioned she was in monetary pressure, residing off bank cards. She mentioned she dropped off payroll for 2 months, which we all know now was not true,” Chief Magistrate Geason mentioned.”Ms Rodgers is operating an extremely profitable enterprise. She is aware of how to take care of cash coming in and cash popping out. I discover it tough to settle for any submission that there was a misperception.”She mentioned whereas monetary hardship might be a mitigating issue for theft, this was not the case in Ms Rodgers’s state of affairs.”It’s tough to settle for that her notion about her monetary state of affairs might be so skewed as a result of there’s tangible and goal materials obtainable to her,” she mentioned.”She’s shopping for these issues, she’s happening her abroad journey, she’s happening interstate journeys. It’s all tangible.” Ms Rodgers was an informal worker at Bupa for 2 years.(ABC News: Nic MacBean)Mr Cangelosi had needed to depend on a psychologist’s report that attributed Ms Rodgers’s stealing to her anxiousness, however the chief Justice of the Peace believed the report was written on the idea that Ms Rodgers had greater than $50,000 in debt, which was “not true”.”If he was informed that as it seems, there was no debt, he could have a unique view about what he mentioned in there,” Chief Magistrate Geason mentioned.She additionally doubted Ms Rodgers’s degree of regret due to the completely different tales she had informed individuals.”There’s plenty of issues that Ms Rodgers has mentioned to individuals and all of it seems to be not true,” the Chief Magistrate mentioned.”Tells police that she has debt. Not true.”That Bupa regularly mucked up her pay and that she wanted cash. Not true.”She informed police that there was one other Olivia Rodgers and employees had paid cash into that account. Not true.”There’s a variety of issues put by Ms Rodgers that aren’t true and tangible different proof to recommend in any other case.””It goes on, neighborhood corrections, Dr Jordan [the psychologist].”The court agreed that the psychologist’s understanding of Ms Rodgers’s debt wanted to be clarified earlier than sentencing may proceed.